Legal Opinion

Rhodes v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 4, 1978No. Appeals, Nos. 139, 140, 141 and 142 C.D. 1977PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Mencer,

These appeals arise out of claims for unemployment benefits filed by approximately 2400 employees *200of Westinghouse Air Brake Company (Company), as a result of their unemployment for the 2 weeks ending November 8 and November 15, 1975. The claims were denied by the Bureau of Employment Security (Bureau). Pursuant to an agreement between the Bureau, the Company, and the United Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers of America, Local 610 (UE), the claims of Donald Rhodes, Albert Guiliano, and Lloyd E. Myers are to be treated as “fairly representative” of the claims of all…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review of the Commonwealth v. TickleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Kanouse v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review of the Commonwealth v. G. C. Murphy Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Borello v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Wright v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. School District v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API