Legal Opinion
Krolak v. Dubicki, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 3, 2003PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Floyd, J.), entered August 21, 2002, which, upon the granting of the motion of the defendants Dubicki, Inc., and Dubicki Auto Body, Inc., for summary judgment, dismissed the complaint insofar as asserted against them.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The movants met their burden of establishing their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law based upon their deposition testimony that they performed no work on the components of a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gallo v. Bay Ridge Lincoln Mercury, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Pollock v. Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Nichols v. Cummins Engine Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Williams v. Healy International Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Lopez v. Mackenzie Electrical Contractors, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Scordo v. Costco Wholesale Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- AKV Auto Transport, Inc. v. Syosset Truck Sales, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Tantuccio v. Marina Holding Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005