Legal Opinion

Rubenstein v. City of Chicago

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided July 18, 1985No. Nos. 84 C 8590, 69 C 2145PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORAN, District Judge.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This case presents the question whether the respondent City of Chicago violated the Shakman consent decree when firing the petitioner. The cross motions for summary judgment raise two issues: first, whether petitioner’s position is exempt from the decree and, second, if not, whether petitioner’s firing stemmed improperly from his political inclinations.

FACTS

Petitioner Sherwin Rubenstein had been an employee of the City for eighteen years when he was terminated from his job on September 26, 1984. He joined the City workforce as chief virologist within…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Branti v. FinkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Edward Nekolny, Patrick Dumas, and Maria L. Dahms v. Ann B. Painter, Individually and as Supervisor of Lyons Township, DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
  4. Donald C. Tomczak v. The City of Chicago, an Illinois Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  5. Shakman v. Democratic Organization of Cook Cty.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Murtaugh v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1987
  2. Rubenstein v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API