Legal Opinion
Susser v. Carvel Corporation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 7, 1962PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAWSON, District Judge.
I. General Nature of the Actions.
These are nine separate cases which were consolidated for trial. By consent of the parties the trial was held without a jury.
The plaintiffs in all cases are persons who are or were operators, under franchise agreements, of Carvel Dari-Freeze Stores at which “soft” ice cream was sold. Defendant Carvel Corporation and its subsidiaries issued the franchises, sold the basic equipment needed for operation of the stores and performed other related functions. 1 2The other corporate defendants in the actions are the suppliers of various products…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- United States v. Colgate & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- International Salt Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Tampa Electric Co. v. Nashville Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. RazumicSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Instructional Systems, Inc. v. Computer Curriculum Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- Bernard Susser v. Carvel Corporation, Carvel Dari-Freeze Stores, Inc., Carvel Stores Realty Corporation, and Eight Other CasesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- The Poster Exchange, Inc. v. National Screen Service Corporation, Columbia Pictures Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- The Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corporation, the Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.