Legal Opinion
In re Anthony WW.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 7, 2011PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKavanagh, J.
Respondent and Michael WW. (hereinafter the father) are married and have three children, and the procedural history and legal arguments in this matter are nearly identical to those in Matter of Anthony WW. (Michael WW.) (86 AD3d 654 [2011] [decided herewith]), involving the father. While factual distinc*663tions between the two matters do exist, the reports and related testimony of the two psychologists who evaluated respondent suffer from the same deficiencies as those encountered in the proceeding brought against the father and, as presented, should not have been admitted into evidence at…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. StoneNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- In re Anthony WW.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Murphy v. WoodsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Mohammad v. MohammadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re Anthony WW.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- In re Anthony WW.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- In re Anthony WW.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013