State v. Alexander
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtForrest, J.
The State appeals the exceptional sentences of Cesar Villela and James Alexander, contending the record does not support the findings, the findings do not present substantial and compelling reasons to depart from the standard range sentence, and the sentences are clearly too lenient. We reverse and remand for resentencing.
On June 26,1991, Seattle Police Officer Ceja was working undercover in a narcotics buy/bust operation in the 1500 block of Second Avenue, Seattle, Washington. Officer Ceja approached James Alexander; Alexander asked Ceja if he wanted some "coca" (cocaine). Officer Ceja said…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. ArmstrongWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. PascalWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. HutsellWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. AllertWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. EstrellaWashington Supreme Court · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. FieldsMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. AlexanderWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. HodgesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
- State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
- State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.