Legal Opinion

Deep Vein Coal Co. v. Dowdle

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1941No. 27,535PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFansler, J.

In 1919 the appellee began this action by filing his complaint against Frank Buchanan to recover damages resulting from an assault and battery. Shortly' thereafter the Princeton Coal Company was made a party defendant. The complaint was amended to allege that Buchanan was the agent and servant of the Princeton Coal Company and was acting as its servant at the time the assault and battery was perpetrated. The record shows that the Princeton Coal Company appeared to this action and defended.- There was a trial and judgment for the plaintiff. The Princeton Coal Company perfected a term time…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Princeton Coal Co. v. DowdleIndiana Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gibson v. Miami Valley Milk Producers, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. Weer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Deep Vein Coal Co. v. DowdleIndiana Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Flesch v. Circle City Excavating & Rental Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1965
  5. Bock v. Bock's EstateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API