Legal Opinion
Hosey v. First National Bank of Goliad
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided February 28, 1980No. 1679PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This appeal is from a judgment rendered in three consolidated causes in which the First National Bank of Goliad was plaintiff and Mr. and Mrs. Amos Hosey were defendants. The judgment recites:
“Prior to conclusion of Plaintiff’s evidence, the parties announced to the Court that all matters in controversy had been settled, and an agreement was dictated into the record, and was thereafter transcribed, and signed, and this Court finds that on the evidence, Plaintiff should have and is entitled to judgment pursuant to said settlement agreement.”
The terms of the settlement agreement are…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Alexander v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
- Dunman v. HartwellTexas Supreme Court · 1853
- DeLee v. Allied Finance Company of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
- Pillow v. McLeanTexas Supreme Court · 1935
- Toplitsky v. ToplitskyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by10 opinions
- Gillum v. Republic Health Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989
- Bexar County Criminal District Attorney's Office v. Mayo, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1989
- Charalambous v. Jean Lafitte Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1983
- Arrington v. ArringtonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Ayala v. Minniti, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.