Neumeyer v. Palmer
South Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal 'from Circuit Court, Davison County. Hon. Frank B. Smith, Judge. Action by J. A. Neumeyer, against Ben. W. Palmer and others, for damages for defendants’ alleged deceit in a transaction of exchange by plaintiff to. defendant of a stock of goods for a tract of land; the action having .-been dismissed as to defendant Baura May Palmer.
Read the full summary
Appeal 'from Circuit Court, Davison County. Hon. Frank B. Smith, Judge. Action by J. A. Neumeyer, against Ben. W. Palmer and others, for damages for defendants’ alleged deceit in a transaction of exchange by plaintiff to. defendant of a stock of goods for a tract of land; the action having .-been dismissed as to defendant Baura May Palmer. From a judgment for plaintiff against the other defendants, and from .the judgment and an order denying a new trial, such dismissed defendant appeals. (1) To point one. of the opinion, Respondent cited: Supreme Court in the case of Skeels v. Poifter (Iowa)…
1Opinion of the CourtWhiting, J.
Action for damages alleged to have been suffered through deceit of defendants. Action dismissed as to defendant Baura May Palmer. Judgment for plaintiff against the other defendant, and from the judgment, and’ an order denying a new trial, such defendant has appealed.
Plaintiff was the owner of a stock of merchandise. Defend^ ant claimed1 tol be the owner of a tract of land described as lots 3, 4, and 5, and the S. E. % of the N. W. JB of section 6, township 104, range 65, Aurora county, S. D., which description we will hereinafter, refer to as the “N. W. of 6.” It is the con-, tention of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Skeels v. PorterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
3Cited by1 opinion
- Thomas v. MettelSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1918