Stoutenburgh v. Dow
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Scott District Court. — Hon. W. F. Bkannan, Judge. ACTION to recover damages lor a personal injury. There was a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff for four thousand dollars. The defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtRoti-irock, J.
I. The defendant is a corporation, and is the owner of three flouring-mills in the city of i. itami Servantl^de-anees? ev£U" denee. Davenport. The plaintiff is a miller by occupation, and about August 17, 1886, he entered the employment of the defendant in 0ne of its mills, known as the “ Crescent Roller Mills.” He was what was known as the “second miller.” The mills were operated night and day, and the plaintiff came on duty at midnight, and continued in charge as miller until noon of that day. The mills are what are known as “roller-mills,” which consist of a succession of sets of rollers,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kroy v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1871
- Muldowney v. Illinois Central R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1874
- Greenleaf v. Dubuque & Sioux City RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
- Lumley v. CaswellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877
3Cited by11 opinions
- Rice v. . Eureka Paper Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Swaim v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1919
- Huggard v. Glucose Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- Buehner ex rel. Buehner v. Creamery Package Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- Gorman v. Des Moines Brick Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1896
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.