Legal Opinion

Paola v. Esposito

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 11, 1990Published

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: Leave to amend pleadings "shall be freely given” absent prejudice or surprise resulting directly from the delay in moving to amend (CPLR 3025 [b]; McCaskey, Davies & Assocs. v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp., 59 NY2d 755, 757). Since the papers do not indicate that defendant can claim prejudice or surprise, it was an abuse of discretion for Supreme Court to deny plaintiff’s motion to amend her reply to assert the Statute of Limitations as an affirmative defense (see,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McCaskey, Davies & Associates, Inc. v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Parker v. SoperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API