Legal Opinion

State v. Cole

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 1, 1991No. 23365PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harwell, Justice:

Appellant Roger Wayne Cole was convicted of driving under a suspended license, second offense, in violation of S.C. Code Ann. § 56-1-460 (Supp. 1989). The question presented is whether we recognize necessity as a defense to driving under a suspended license.

I. FACTS

Appellant stipulated that he was driving under a shspended license. However, appellant claims that there were emergency circumstances which justified his driving. Appellant testified that his wife, who was six months pregnant, was having pains in her back and stomach and needed help. Appellant did not have a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. BaileySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. State v. WorleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
  3. State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  4. State v. HendersonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Stodghill v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. SullivanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  3. Shrum v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Commonwealth v. LivingtonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
  5. David Lee v. Fort Mill, Town OfCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API