Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Minor v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided April 27, 1993No. 91-CF-1014Published

1ConcurrenceTerry, Associate Judge

I join fully in the court’s opinion, but I would go one step further. I would hold that, as a matter of law, possession is not and can never be a lesser included offense of distribution because there is no overlap between the two offenses.

“A lesser-included offense instruction is only proper where the charged greater offense requires the jury to find a disputed factual element which is not required for conviction of the lesser-included offense.” Sansone v. United States, 380 U.S. 343, 350, 85 S.Ct. 1004, 1009, 13 L.Ed.2d 882 (1965) (citations omitted). More recently, the Supreme Court has…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Schmuck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Sansone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Bernard v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Rease v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Hack v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API