Legal Opinion

Gorman v. Finn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 14, 1900Published

Appeal from trial term, New York county. Two actions by Amelia Gorman, executrix of John J. Gorman, deceased, against Daniel E. Finn and others. From a judgment on verdict for plaintiff, and from orders denying motions for new trial, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtHatch, J.

These two actions by the same plaintiff against the same defendants were tried together upon stipulation, and the appeals from the judgments in both cases "are in one record. The *547actions were brought to recover upon the official bond of the defendant Finn given upon his appointment as deputy sheriff for the city and county of New York by John J. Gorman, plaintiff’s testator, then sheriff, to recover damages for alleged breaches of the conditions of the same. The defendants Cleary and Crusius are the sureties on said bond. Finn was appointed a. deputy sheriff in or about January, 1891, and on…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Walling v. . MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  2. In Re the Directors of Christian Jensen Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Winterson v. HitchingsNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API