Legal Opinion

Fetzer v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 9, 1937PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGlennon, J.

The complaint, which is addressed to the equity side of the court, alleges a cause of action for the rescission of the contract of purchase of a guaranteed mortgage certificate on the ground of misrepresentation.

*568The defendant Title Guarantee and Trust Company asserts, and properly so, that the plaintiff has an adequate remedy at law. (Voehl v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co., 155 Misc. 697; affd., 242 App. Div. 762; affd., 266 N. Y. 662.) In Schank v. Schuchman (212 N. Y. 352) Judge Cardozo said: “ The plaintiffs are simply seeking to get back a sum of money paid under a contract, not affecting…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Schank v. . SchuchmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. Seneca Wire & Manufacturing Co. v. A. B. Leach & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. E. T. C. Corp. v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
  4. Voehl v. Title Guarantee and Trust CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
  5. Voehl v. Title Guaranty & Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fetterman v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API