Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Strong

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 27, 2017No. 107535Published

1DissentGarry, J.

I respectfully dissent. Other than retribution, there are three established purposes of sentencing: rehabilitation, deterrence, and the protection of society by isolating the offender (see People v Martinez, 26 NY3d 196, 202 [2015, Pigott, J., dissenting]; People v Broadie, 37 NY2d 100, 112 [1975], cert denied 423 US 950 [1975]; People v Raucci, 136 AD2d 48, 49 [1988]). The paramount and overarching concern is the result upon society; that is, in what manner a particular sentence imposed upon an individual comports with the advancement of our societal goals. Here, I cannot find a societal…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. BroadieNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. People v. CruickshankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. People v. Dawn Maria C.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. The People v. Antonio MartinezNew York Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. People v. FergusonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API