Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided July 18, 1974No. C.D. 4553; Court Nos. 66/53432-B and 66/72134PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Newman, Judge:

The issue in these two consolidated protests concerns the proper rate of duty on merchandise invoiced as “tank blocks”,1 produced in West Germany and imported by plaintiff at the port of New York in 1965. The “tank blocks” were classified by the Government under the provision in item 531.39 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS) for “Other” shaped refractory and heat-insulating articles not specially provided for, and assessed with duty at the rate of 15 per centum ad valorem. Plaintiff claims that the articles are properly dutiable under the provision in item…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nomura (America) Corp. v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
  2. John C. Rogers & Co., Inc. A/c Hoeganaes Sponge Iron Corp. v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
  3. John C. Rogers & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Eastalco Aluminum Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
  2. John C. Rogers & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API