Legal Opinion

OP Ganjo, Inc. v. Tri-Urban Realty Co., Inc.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided December 23, 1969PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

108 N.J. Super. 517 (1969)

261 A.2d 722

O.P. GANJO, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF,

v.

TRI-URBAN REALTY CO., INC., A CORPORATION, AND GEORGE MOSKOWITZ, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.

Decided December 23, 1969.

Mr. Alfred H. Sauer for plaintiff.

Mr. Abraham I. Mayer for defendants (Mayer & Mayer, attorneys).

ACKERMAN, HAROLD A., J.D.C. (temporarily assigned).

This is an action on a promissory note. The ultimate issue is whether plaintiff is a holder in due course.

On May 6, 1968 one John Ferrante, a plasterer, was employed as a subcontractor by the corporate defendant…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Korzenik v. Supreme Radio, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Karafa v. NJ State Lottery Comm.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
  2. First National Bank in Marlinton v. BlackhurstWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Third Nat. Bk., Nashville v. Hardi-Gardens Sup. of Ill., Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1974
  4. Coventry Care, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. United States v. Mark Twain Bank-Kansas CityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API