Legal Opinion

Floyd v. Gore

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 10, 2001No. A01A1527PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Johnson, Presiding Judge.

We granted G. William Floyd’s application for discretionary review of the trial court’s denial of his motion to set aside a judgment. For the reasons which follow, we reverse the judgment of the trial court.

Harold and Barbara Gore were majority stockholders in Acadia Manufacturing Corporation. In November 1986, Floyd loaned Acadia Manufacturing $250,000. Acadia Manufacturing executed a promissory note in favor of Floyd, and the Gores executed a guaranty, wherein they personally agreed to pay the note upon default. The guaranty was secured by a parcel of the Gores’…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Abba Gana v. Abba GanaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  2. Croxton v. MSC Holding, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  3. Johnson v. Mayor &C. of CarrolltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  4. Ashworth v. BusbySupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
  5. Lightsey v. Nalley Equipment Leasing, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. DUKES v. MUNOZ Et Al.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
  2. Wolfe v. GreenDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2009
  3. Basmatie Jorree v. Pmb Rentals, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2019
  4. Mann v. BlalockSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API