Reynolds v. Lacey
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Concurrence
Mr. JUSTICE KASSERMAN,
specially concurring:
I concur with the majority in holding that plaintiff’s complaint for partition was properly dismissed; however, I am of the opinion that the majority has focused unnecessarily upon the question of the best interests of the minor defendant in this case. As a consequence, the majority has failed to consider the fundamental issue presented, being whether a partition action can be brought by an individual whose interest in real property is derived from the assignment of a dower interest which consisted of the receipt for life of a portion of the rents…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Liesman v. LiesmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1928
- Clarke v. ClarkeIllinois Supreme Court · 1932
- Maring v. MeekerIllinois Supreme Court · 1914
- Jones v. McCollenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967
- Mitchell v. Mitchell.Illinois Supreme Court · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.