Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Reynolds v. Lacey

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 15, 1979No. 78-320Published

1Concurrence

Mr. JUSTICE KASSERMAN,

specially concurring:

I concur with the majority in holding that plaintiff’s complaint for partition was properly dismissed; however, I am of the opinion that the majority has focused unnecessarily upon the question of the best interests of the minor defendant in this case. As a consequence, the majority has failed to consider the fundamental issue presented, being whether a partition action can be brought by an individual whose interest in real property is derived from the assignment of a dower interest which consisted of the receipt for life of a portion of the rents…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Liesman v. LiesmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Clarke v. ClarkeIllinois Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Maring v. MeekerIllinois Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Jones v. McCollenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967
  5. Mitchell v. Mitchell.Illinois Supreme Court · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API