Legal Opinion

Pawn v. Wall

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 25, 1928No. Docket No. 6123PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKoford, P. J.

By this action plaintift seeks to recover her trunk or the value thereof, $3,159.50, in ease it cannot be returned. The defendants were proprietors of the Hotel Gotham, where the plaintiff had remained for some time as a guest until August 26, 1923. On that day she departed and left her trunk in the care of the defendants, to be sent for later. Defendants failed to redeliver it upon demand subsequently made and plaintiff commenced this action on February 19, 1924, more than ninety days after her from the hotel. The defendants pleaded several defenses based upon code sections limiting and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Carol v. MonteleoneSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1916
  2. Oxford Hotel Co. v. LindSupreme Court of Colorado · 1909

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Forte Hotels InternationalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  2. Martin v. Holiday Inns, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1988
  3. Bank Savings Life Insurance v. SchrollSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
  4. Hummingbird v. SchurichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API