Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Commonwealth v. Batts

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 4, 2015No. 1764 EDA 2014Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

CONCURRING AND DISSENTING OPINION BY

FITZGERALD, J.:

The Majority Opinion thoroughly summarizes the factual and procedural history of the instant appeal, as well as the legal *47framework established by Miller and the prior Pennsylvania Supreme. Court decision in this matter.1 Majority Op. at 35-41. I concur that Miller must be applied narrowly as.a rejection of the mandatory imposition of a juvenile life-without-parole sentence. See id. at 38-39 (discussing Batts II, 66 A.3d at 295-96). I also agree the current law does not support Appellant’s suggestion that we import the standards and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WallsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Commonwealth v. TuladzieckiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Commonwealth v. BegleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Commonwealth v. KnoxSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  5. Rogers v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API