Commonwealth v. Batts
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
CONCURRING AND DISSENTING OPINION BY
FITZGERALD, J.:
The Majority Opinion thoroughly summarizes the factual and procedural history of the instant appeal, as well as the legal *47framework established by Miller and the prior Pennsylvania Supreme. Court decision in this matter.1 Majority Op. at 35-41. I concur that Miller must be applied narrowly as.a rejection of the mandatory imposition of a juvenile life-without-parole sentence. See id. at 38-39 (discussing Batts II, 66 A.3d at 295-96). I also agree the current law does not support Appellant’s suggestion that we import the standards and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WallsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Commonwealth v. TuladzieckiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. BegleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Commonwealth v. KnoxSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Rogers v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.