Legal Opinion

Spiegel v. Continental Illinois National Bank

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided May 13, 1986No. 85-1871PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COFFEY, Circuit Judge.

The district court dismissed Marshall C. Spiegel’s (“Spiegel”) civil RICO action1 on the grounds of res judicata and for failing to state a claim, Spiegel appealed. We affirm.

I

Marshall Spiegel, the plaintiff-appellant in the present case, filed three separate lawsuits against the defendants-appellees herein, arising out of a dispute over the defendants’ management of a trust established by the grantor Oscar Spiegel for the benefit of his son, Marshall. For convenience, we shall refer to Spiegel’s initial action filed against the defendants-appellees in the Circuit Court…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Pereira v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. Haroco, Inc. v. American National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago, Walter E. Heller International Corporation, & Ronald J. GrayheckCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  5. United States v. MazeSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Mars Steel Corp. v. Continental Bank N.A.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  2. Michael Schertz and Beverly Schertz v. Waupaca CountyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  3. Morin v. TrupinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
  4. Smith v. PotterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  5. Marvin M. Weinstein v. University of IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API