Legal Opinion

Clark County v. City of Los Angeles

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1975No. 7577PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Zenoff, J.:

The City of Los Angeles, its Department of Water and Power, and The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California protested the imposition of property taxes against them for their use of Hoover Dam power generating equipment which was located within the boundaries of Clark County. The trial court granted judgment that the taxes were illegally imposed from which Clark County appeals.

Hoover Dam is owned by the United States of America and is operated through the Bureau of Reclamation, Department of the Interior. The Dam straddles the Colorado River at a point…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sutter Hospital v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. SAN FRANCISCO BOYS'CLUB v. County of MendocinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. Sarah Dix Hamlin School v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. United States of America: Aerojet General Corp. v. State Ex Rel. BekoNevada Supreme Court · 1972

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Clark County Sports Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Las VegasNevada Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Opinion No. (1979), Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1979
  3. State v. City of BurbankNevada Supreme Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API