Legal Opinion

Vakil v. Idnani

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided November 5, 1987PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRAWFORD, Judge.

Plaintiffs, Suresh P. Vakil, and wife Su-dha S. Vakil, buyers under a real estate sales contract sued sellers, Rajengra G. Idnani and wife, Hoor R. Idnani, for a rescission of the contract, and the deed and security instruments executed in closing the transaction. At the conclusion of the nonjury trial, the trial court entered an order denying rescission, but ordering a reformation of the warranty deed from the seller to the buyer. The buyers have appealed and present three issues for review which we quote from their brief:

1. In an action for rescission, were…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Early v. StreetTennessee Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Robinson v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1978
  3. Hood v. WaldrumCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1968
  4. McMillan v. American Suburban Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Wilson v. Mid-State Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Memorial Hospital of Laramie County v. Healthcare Realty Trust Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  2. Klosterman Development Corp. v. Outlaw Aircraft Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2002
  3. Bedwell v. BedwellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1989
  4. Parker v. Union Planters Corp.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2002
  5. Case Handyman Service of Tennessee, LLC v. Helen Marie Harben LeeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2012

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API