Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Burridge

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided January 9, 1933PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Foley, S.

Heretofore application was made by Emilie Holland, who claims under a contract with the decedent to pay her fifty dollars a month during her lifetime, to compel the legal representative of the decedent’s estate to pay the judgments obtained by her on the contract in the Municipal Court. She also sought to compel the estate either to set aside a capital sum to secure by the income thereof the payment of the monthly sum due her during her lifetime.or, in the alternative, for an order directing the representative of the estate to make a present lump payment in full liquidation of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McGean v. ParsonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of RunalsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1972
  2. In re the Accounting of MeyersNew York Surrogate's Court · 1952
  3. In re the Accounting of H. Sylvia A. H. G. WilksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API