Emerson, Talcott & Co. v. McCormick Harvesting Machine Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Kalamazoo. Trover. Plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtS heewood, J.
The parties to this suit are two corporations organized under the laws of the state of Illinois; and .at the time of the commencement. of this suit both were engaged in the business of introducing and vending agricultural implements in Kalamazoo in this State ; each having a business office at that place and a depository of such implements. While the parties-were thus engaged in business the facts and circumstances transpired out of which the alleged cause of action in the ease arose, and all occurred in ithis State.
The action is trover for the conversion by defendant of *6five hundred dollars…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Price v. HickokSupreme Court of Vermont · 1866
- Stall v. DiamondMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
- Jewell v. LamoreauxMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lapham v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
- Isle Royale Land Corp. v. OsmunMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Zochrison v. Redemption Gold Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937