Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Smith

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 22, 1976No. 75-158Published

1Dissent

Mr. JUSTICE GEORGE J. MORAN,

dissenting:

I do not believe that section 3 — 8—10 of the Unified Code of Corrections (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1975, ch. 38, par. 1003 — 8—10) was the applicable speedy trial statute. That section speaks of “untried complaints, charges or indictments pending in any county” and says “The state’s attorney shaU then procure the presence of said defendant for trial in his county by writ of habeas corpus.” (Emphasis added.) Crimes allegedly committed by a prison inmate in a prison, however, can be prosecuted only in the county where the prison is located. (See Ill. Rev. Stat.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. The People v. LoveIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
  2. People v. SpicuzzaIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
  3. People v. VaughnAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
  4. People v. HundleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API