Legal Opinion
Bishop v. State
Court of Appeals of Mississippi
Decided November 7, 2000No. 1999-KA-00992-COAPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
771 So.2d 397 (2000)
Maurice BISHOP, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Mississippi, Appellee.
No. 1999-KA-00992-COA.
Court of Appeals of Mississippi.
November 7, 2000.
Raymond L. Wong, William Kethley Dossett, Cleveland, Attorneys for Appellant.
Office of the Attorney General by W. Glenn Watts, Attorney for Appellee.
BEFORE SOUTHWICK, P.J., IRVING, AND PAYNE, JJ.
IRVING, J., for the Court:
¶ 1. Maurice Bishop was convicted of uttering a forgery. Aggrieved, Bishop has filed this appeal in which he contends (1) that the trial court committed reversible error in admitting an uttering a forgery conviction that was…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- McClain v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1993
- May v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1984
- Coleman v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1997
- Gavin v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1985
- Peterson v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2001
- Gray v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2002
- Perry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2004
- Jenkins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2003
- Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.