Legal Opinion

Urban Services Group, Inc. v. Royal Group, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 18, 2008No. A08A2440PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Andrews, Judge.

In the course of this action for contribution and indemnity by Urban Services Group, Inc. against The Royal Group, Inc., the trial court granted summary judgment to Royal on the ground that Royal’s janitorial contract did not require it to clear the ice from the courthouse sidewalk on which the plaintiff in the underlying tort suit slipped and fell. We hold that Royal’s contract unambiguously provided for its removal of all ice accumulations from the courthouse sidewalks, but that the record before us does not otherwise permit a resolution of the parties’ responsibilities as a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Espinal v. Melville Snow Contractors, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Margolin v. New York Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. Huggins v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  4. First Data POS, Inc. v. WillisSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
  5. Marchman & Sons, Inc. v. NelsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. WELCH v. PAPPAS RESTAURANTS, INC. (Two Cases)Supreme Court of Georgia · 2023
  2. Douglas Asphalt Co. v. Georgia Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  3. Gaulden v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  4. Cls Entertainment, Inc. v. Kenkam, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2024
  5. Crystal Gaulden v. Daniel GreenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API