Legal Opinion

Parr v. Spartanburg &c. R. R.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 19, 1895PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Before.Gary, J., Fairfield, September, 1893. Action by Henry L. Parr against the Spartanburg, Union and Columbia Bailroad Company.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Pope.

The plaintiff brought an action against the defendant before Jos. McMeekin, Esq., a trial justice in and for Fairfield County, in June, 1893, for $95, damages for the negligent killing of plaintiff’s mule colt. The defendant denied any liability for the tort, on the grounds that it had leased its railroad to the Bichmond and Danville Bailroad Company, which latter company had, under the order of the United States Circuit Court, been put into the hands of receivers, who were operating such leased road at the time the mule colt was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Railroad Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1873

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. McCabe's Admx. v. Maysville & B. S. R.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1902
  2. Reed v. Southern RailwaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1906
  3. Illinois Central Ry. Co. v. Sheegog's Admr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
  4. Williard v. Spartanburg, U. & C. R. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina · 1903
  5. Kirkland v. Charleston & Western Carolina Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1908

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API