Legal Opinion

DeSantis v. Zoning Hearing Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 12, 2012PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge LEAVITT.

Antonietta and Marian DeSantis (Landowners) appeal, pro se, the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Beaver County (trial court) granting dimensional variances to the City of Aliquippa for its proposed police department substation. In doing so, the trial court affirmed the decision of the Zoning Hearing Board of the City of Aliquippa (Board) that the substation was a permitted use and that the City would suffer a hardship without a dimensional variance. Landowners raise a number of errors, but we do not reach them because we conclude that the trial court was required…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Borough of Jenkintown v. Board of CommissionersCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Gryshuk v. KolbCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Nextel Partners, Inc. v. Clarks Summit BoroughCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gibraltar Rock, Inc. v. New Hanover Township Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. J. Maund and E. Pagac v. ZHB of California BoroughCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. The City of Clairton v. ZHB of the City of Clairton and Cornerstone Residence, Inc. v. ZHB of the City of Clairton and G. GlagolaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  4. The City of Clairton, PA v. ZHB of the City of Clairton, PA, & Cornerstone Residence, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API