Legal Opinion

M.J.T. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 12, 2006No. 2D05-1566PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, Judge.

M.J.T. challenges the trial court’s order requiring him to pay $1113.57 in restitution. The State concedes that the explanation of medical benefits (EOMB) forms that were introduced to support the victim’s claim for medical costs were not properly admitted. We agree and, accordingly, reverse and remand for a new restitution hearing.

*1078The only evidence introduced at the restitution hearing to support the victim’s medical costs were the EOMB forms, which specifically state that they are not medical bills. While medical bills may be introduced without producing the records custodian…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. A.J. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  2. Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bellot v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
  2. Boone v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  3. MJT v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API