Legal Opinion

Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. Curlin

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 12, 1933No. 4-3119PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Johnson, C. J.,

(after stating the facts). The sole question presented on this appeal for determination is, will mandamus lie to compel a collector to accept school district warrants in payment of past-due district school tax due to the district -issuing the warrants? Appellant insists that it will, and appellees deny the right.

Section 10,045 of Crawford & Moses’ Digest reads as follows: “The collector shall receive county warrants- in payment of county taxes, the orders or warrants that may be payable on presentation of any town, city or school district for their respective taxes, and the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Horne v. Paragould Special School District No. 1Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1933

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pritchett v. SpicerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2017
  2. McCall, Collector v. Armstrong, TreasurerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API