Legal Opinion

Hutnik v. Brodsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 25, 1962PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Order, entered on May 2, 1962, denying motion by defendant to dismiss the action for failure to prosecute, unanimously reversed on the law and on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, with $20 costs and disbursements to appellant, and the motion granted, with $10 costs. The plaintiff has failed to present a satisfactory excuse to justify the delay of 22 months in prosecuting this action. The reason presented for the delay was that the plaintiff was waiting for the defendant to keep a promise to arrange for plaintiff’s physical examination. But the responsibility for the diligent…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sedito v. MoskowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API