Legal Opinion · Dissent

Pierce v. Woods

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1980Published

1DissentHarbison, Justice

I respectfully dissent.

It was stipulated in this case that although both the husband and wife worked during their marriage, the earnings of the husband constituted ninety-two percent of their gross receipts and that he contributed that percentage of the purchase price of their residence, taxation of which is now in dispute.

Insofar as the majority seem to conclude, contrary to the stipulation of the parties, that as a matter of fact the contributions of the wife, economic and otherwise, justify taxing only fifty percent of the value of the residence in the husband’s estate, I have no…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tyler v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. United States v. JacobsSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Robinson v. Trousdale CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Murfreesboro Bank & Trust Co. v. EvansTennessee Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Abernathy v. BoydTennessee Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API