Legal Opinion

Takahashi v. White Truck & Transfer Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 30, 1936No. Civ. 10581; Civ. 10583PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHINN, J., pro tem.

In consolidated actions for damages for personal injuries suffered in a single accident, the court after verdicts in favor of plaintiffs, notwithstanding such verdicts, entered judgments in favor of the defendant. Plaintiffs appeal separately upon a single record.

Some two hours before.sunrise on a rainy morning plaintiffs, traveling in an automobile driven by plaintiff Takahashi at a speed of thirty-five or forty miles per hour, ran into the rear of a slowly moving trailer loaded with oil well casing. The question on each appeal is whether there was substantial evidence…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Grimes v. Richfield Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
  2. Lockie v. PenceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  3. Carswell v. Pacific Greyhound Lines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1935

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Alarid v. VanierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Hamilton v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Hinton v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. O'NEAL v. Kelly Pipe Co.California Court of Appeal · 1946
  5. Alarid v. VanierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API