Myers v. Astoria Convalescent Hospital
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
COBEY, Acting P. J.
The above-named plaintiff, Director of the State Department of Health Services, appeals from three judgments on the pleadings in favor of the three above-named defendant convalescent hospitals. Each judgment rests upon the ground that the penalty setup in the Long-Term Care, Health, Safety, and Security Act of 1973 (hereafter Act) (Health & Saf. Code, § 1417 et seq.) 1 deprived each defendant of constitutional due process of law. We have consolidated these three appeals since they raise the same legal issues. Each judgment terminated an enforcement action for civil…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Colten v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Corbitt v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- McDermott v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Lackner v. PerkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Beach v. Western Medical Enterprises, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1981
- Myers v. Eastwood Care Center, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1982
- Kizer v. Waterman Convalescent Hospital, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1992
- Summit Care-California, Inc. v. Deartment of Health ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986