Legal Opinion

Goodman v. First Unum Life Insurance Company

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided May 3, 2023No. 2:21-cv-00902Unknown

1Opinion

1 The Honorable Barbara J. Rothstein 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 9 10 TANYA GOODMAN, CASE NO. 2:21-cv-00902-BJR 11 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART 12 v. PLAINTIFF TANYA GOODMAN’S MOTION FOR 13 FIRST UNUM LIFE INSURANCE JUDGMENT ON THE RECORD COMPANY and UNUM GROUP, 14 Defendants. 15 16 This matter comes before the Court on the cross-motions for judgment on the record under 17 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52 by Defendants First Unum Life Insurance Company and Unum 18 Group (collectively, “Unum”), Dkt. No. 31, and Plaintiff Tanya…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Rex T. KEARNEY, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  4. Muniz v. Amec Construction Management, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. Mongeluzo v. Baxter Travenol Long Term Disability Benefit PlanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API