Legal Opinion

State v. Bishop

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 16, 2002No. 32A01-0106-CV-238PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SULLIVAN, Judge.

Appellant, the State of Indiana, commenced an eminent domain proceeding against land owned by Stephen and Molly *338Bishop.1 Following a jury trial upon the issue of the compensation owed the Bishops, the trial court ordered the State to pay the Bishops $508,185.78. Upon appeal, the State presents three issues which we restate as follows:

I. Whether the trial court improperly denied the State’s motion to withdraw its timely-fíled exceptions to the appraisers’ report;

II. Whether the trial court erred in allowing the Bishops to present evidence of the capitalization of income…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Gradison v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Martin v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Clark v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1946
  4. Van Sickle v. Kokomo Water Works Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1959
  5. State v. Church of Nazarene of LogansportIndiana Supreme Court · 1978

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. BishopIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. BishopIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API