Legal Opinion
AHT Corp. v. Moses
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided February 4, 2005No. 03-5027Published
1Opinion of the Court
*18SUMMARY ORDER
UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of said district court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED.
Plaintiff-appellant AHT Corporation (“AHT”) appeals from an April 4, 2003, judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Colleen McMahon, Judge), granting summary judgment to defendant-appellee Timothy Moses with regard to AHT’s fraud and negligent misrepresentation claims. Familiarity with the facts and procedural history is assumed. We affirm.
After a proposed merger between AHT and defendant BioShield…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Emergent Capital Investment Management, LLC v. Stonepath Group, Inc., Previously Known as Net Value Holdings, Inc., Andrew Panzo and Lee HansenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Lazard Freres & Co., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. Protective Life Insurance Company, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Mallis v. Bankers Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Grumman Allied Industries, Inc. And Grumman Corporation v. Rohr Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Hyosung America, Inc. v. Sumagh Textile Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998