Legal Opinion

General Specialties, Inc. v. Charter National Bank—Houston

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 24, 1985No. A14-84-525CVPublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ELLIS, Justice.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment based on seven (7) promissory notes. We reverse and remand for trial because we find the motion for summary judgment and the affidavits filed in support of the summary judgment motion do not contain enough information to establish that there is no genuine issue of fact.

Appellants, General Specialties, Inc. and Vaughn Boykin, raise one point of error on appeal. In their point of error, they allege that the trial court erred in granting appel-lee’s motion for summary judgment. They allege error for two reasons. Appellants argue…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gibbs v. General Motors CorporationTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Wilcox v. St. Mary's University of San Antonio, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Prestegord v. GlennTexas Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Sparks v. Cameron Employees Credit UnionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984
  5. Ecurie Cerveza Racing Team, Inc. v. Texas Commerce Bank—SoutheastCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Nguyen Ngoc Giao v. Smith & Lamm, P.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1986
  2. American 10-Minute Oil Change, Inc. v. Metropolitan National Bank-Farmers Branch, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989
  3. FFP Marketing Co. v. Long Lane Master Trust IVCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2005
  4. Tesoro Petroleum Corp. v. Coastal Refining & Marketing, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988
  5. Affordable Motor Co., Inc. v. Lna, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2011

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API