Legal Opinion
Tannen v. Tannen
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided December 8, 2011PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Per curiam
The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in'Judge Messano’s opinion of the Appellate Division reported at 416 N.J.Super. 248, 3 A.3d 1229 (2010).
For affirmance—Chief Justice RABNER, and Justices LONG, LaVECCHIA, ALBIN, HOENS,-and PATTERSON—6.
Opposed—None.
Not Participating—Judge WEFING (temporarily assigned)—1.
2Cited by17 opinions
- Jacoby v. JacobyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2012
- Santiago v. New York & New Jersey Port AuthorityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2012
- Nuwave Investment Corp. v. Hyman Beck & Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2013
- Krys v. AaronDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
- A.J.V. VS. M.M.V. (FM-14-1402-14, MORRIS COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2021
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.