Legal Opinion
In re Jose T.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 30, 2011PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum:
On appeal from an order in this proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10-A, the Attorney for the Child contends that Family Court erred in determining that continuing the permanency goal of placement for adoption for the child is in his best interests. We agree with the Attorney for the Child that the court’s determination lacks a sound and substantial basis in the record (see Matter of Sean S. [Halvorsen], 85 AD3d 1575 [2011]; see generally Matter of Telsa Z. [Rickey Z.], 74 AD3d 1434 [2010]; Matter of Jennifer R., 29 AD3d 1003, 1004-1005 [2006]). We therefore modify the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In re Jennifer R.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re Cristella B. Suffolk County Department of Social ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- In re Telsa Z.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- In re Michael D.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- In re Sean S.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re Latanya H.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- H., LATANYA, MTR. OFAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Matter of N. KK.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015