Legal Opinion

Royal Indemnity Co. v. Wilson

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 11, 1931No. Nos. 1077 & 1078Published

1Opinion of the CourtHornbeck, J.

A determination of the right of the Royal Indemnity Company to reach the.claim of Snyder against Wilson in its attachment proceeding instituted prior to the judgment in favor of Snyder is somewhat difficult-. Ohio offers no decision directly in point. The claim of Snyder against Wilson could have been stated upon money had and received which was due Snyder in a definite sum or an indebitatus court in assumpsit. —Bates Pleading pages 2195-2196. The amount claimed to be owing being in pursuance of an axpress contract by the terms of which Wilson was to sell mortgages, the property of Snyder,,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fisher v. ConsequaU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania · 1809
  2. Davis v. HamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1807
  3. Case v. DeweyMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Clark v. WilsonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1819

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API