Legal Opinion

Liebert v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided November 27, 1973No. C.R.D. 73-28; Court No. 70/27045PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Newman, Judge:

Defendant has moved to strike the complaint filed in this action, which is captioned “Border Brokerage Co., Inc., Plaintiff v. The United States, Defendant”.1 The basis of defendant’s motion is that Border Brokerage is not the plaintiff in this action, but rather a complete stranger thereto, and hence was not authorized to file the complaint pursuant to rule 4.4.

In its opposition to defendant’s motion, plaintiff concedes that Border Brokerage was improperly named as plaintiff in the caption of the complaint in lieu of the proper party-plaintiff, C. F. Liebert, importer of record…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. International Mercantile Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
  2. Boise Cascade Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
  3. Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Superscope, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API