Legal Opinion
Vandenburg v. Brosnan
New York Court of Appeals
Decided January 14, 1988PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (129 AD2d 793). We note in addition, with respect to plaintiffs claim of common-law negligence, that the principles applied by the Appellate Division were recently reaffirmed by this court (see, D’Amico v Christie, 71 NY2d 76).
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- D'Amico v. ChristieNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Vandenburg v. BrosnanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
3Cited by21 opinions
- Greenberg Traurig of New York, P.C. v. Moody, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
- Orr v. Kinderhill Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Prunty v. Keltie's Bum SteerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Robbins v. McCarthyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- Dodge v. Victory Markets, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.