Legal Opinion
Waldman v. Waldman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided August 30, 1993PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, (1) (a) the plaintiff husband appeals, as limited by his notice of appeal and brief, from stated portions of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hyman, J.H.O.), dated November 8, 1990, which, after a nonjury trial, inter alia, (i) determined that certain real property known as the Bowery property was marital property subject to equitable distribution, (ii) determined the value of the Bowery property, (iii) determined the value of other property known as the Penn Plaza property, (iv) awarded the defendant wife maintenance, and (v)…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lischynsky v. LischynskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- MATTER OF CONIFER BALDWINSVILLE ASSOCS. v. Town of Van BurenNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Schoeneck v. City of SyracuseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Milton Harbor Co. v. Assessor of RyeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- Conifer Baldwinsville Associates v. Town of Van BurenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hamroff v. HamroffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Atwal v. AtwalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Stavans v. StavansAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994