Legal Opinion

Gammon v. First Dominion Development Corp.

Richmond City Circuit Court

Decided February 13, 1970Published

1Opinion of the Court

By JUDGE A. CHRISTIAN COMPTON

My review of the law following the plaintiff's application for appointment of a receiver made yesterday morning has caused me to change my decision announced then to you upon the requirement for a bond. The law seems clear that such a bond and security is necessary. Deckert v. Ches. Western Co., 101 Va. 804, 812 (1903). See also 45 Am. Jur., Receivers, Section 94, p. 83. Therefore a receiver's bond and security for the faithful discharge of his duties will be required by the court in this siiit.

In addition, this review of the law raises in my mind the question of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Deckert v. Chesapeake Western Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API