Legal Opinion

Grant v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 8, 1906PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Petition for certiorari. Before Judge Seabrook. Effingham superior court. August 15, 1906. Sanction of a petition for certiorari from a judgment of conviction in the county court was refused by the judge of the superior court, “for want of proper affidavit;” and the petitioners excepted.

Read the full summary

Petition for certiorari. Before Judge Seabrook. Effingham superior court. August 15, 1906. Sanction of a petition for certiorari from a judgment of conviction in the county court was refused by the judge of the superior court, “for want of proper affidavit;” and the petitioners excepted. The petition was followed by two affidavits of the petitioners, — one that “the petition for certiorari is not filed in the ease for the purpose of delay only, and we fully believe that we have good cause for certioraring, and that the facts stated in the foregoing petition aré true, so far as they come…

1Opinion of the CourtEvans, J.

This case is controlled by the decision of this court in King v. State, 122 Ga. 153, approved and followed in Bennett v. State, 125 Ga. 10, and Blassingame v. State, Id. 293.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. King v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Bennett v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Farley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  2. Hogan v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API